Sunday, September 10, 2006

Meaning spending reform needed

After watching the emergency budget workshop last Thursday, I began to wonder just who is running Hernando County government. The committee of 25, the county staff, Linda Hayward's petitions, the county commissioners, just who??? I commend Commissioner's Stabins, Hogan and Robinson for representing the people with a millage rate reduction but even their approach was short-sighted when you look at the long term needs of our rapidly expanding county. Trust in government is the essential element that Commissioner Stabins is trying to restore, by pushing for a large millage rate reduction in Ad Valorem taxes. The naysayers bring up the mere $36.00 this tax relief could bring to the homeowner in Hernando County. We were told this $36.00 would not even buy a tank of gas for an automobile. For someone watching their pennies, $36.00 could buy several pairs of inexpensive shoes for their children at Wal Mart. Speaking of Wal Mart, Commissioner Rowden threw out a large dollar figure that Wal Mart would save if an Ad Valorem rate reduction takes place this year like this was somehow evil. This type of analogy is a classic example of the demonization of corporate America played out by liberal democrats everyday across this nation. The problem with this type of analogy is corporations do not pay taxes, people do, and many small business entities across the county are being crippled by extremely high assessments on their businesses because there is no 3% cap on commercial property. Besides, I could never understand why corporations are criticized when they produce jobs, and wealth in America. Getting back to the point of being short-sighted when looking at the long term needs of Hernando County, none of the county commissioners ever mentioned cutting spending as a viable approach to budget control. Oh, a few sacrificial lambs were offered to cut spending several weeks ago by the county staff, but were pale in comparison to what is needed to be fiscally prudent with our tax dollars. Has anyone ever wondered why the county spending equals collected tax revenue? Its called projective budgeting, or locking up all monies collected by taxpayers. Sheriff Nugent stated at this workshop that if the county commissioners did not approve his budget he could go over their heads to the governor. One major job function of the county commission is to oversee the budget by being good stewards of our tax dollars. It is their responsibility to question the budgets of the sheriff, the clerk of court, the tax collector, the supervisor of elections, and the property appraiser but this was largely ignored during the budget review process. Yes, any constitutional officer can go directly to the governor if they think their budget is being jeopardized by the county commissioners but do you really think that would happen? The backlash for any constitutional officer having to justify their budget to the governor, let alone the citizens of Hernando County, would be political suicide. Its about time the county commissioners stand up to the challenge presented to them and question all budget entities, even the constitutional officers. Budget director, George Zoettlin, indicated at this workshop that a good credit rating is necessary for additional bonding, as in the bonding of the costs related to the old hospital renovation. It appeared that Commissioner Kingsley voted against tax relief based on these bond statements by Mr. Zoettlin. New bonding issues seemed to fly right under the radar scope of some of the county commissioners who were focused on tax relief for the citizens. Hernando County is already bonded up to the hilt with many projects like the new animal services building, the emergency operations building, two new libraries, and the purchase of Florida Water Services, not to mention the outstanding mortgages on several fire stations in Hernando County. What happened to save first, then buy approach for government services instead of putting our county further into debt? The implementation of zero-based budgeting should be a first start in correcting the age-old practices of the tax and spend mind-think of our elected officials. Meaningful spending reform and tax relief is essential to restoring our faith in the system before any discussion can take place on the future needs of county government.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

"The demonization of corporate America by liberal Democrats" could be a reflection of the growing anxiety amongst working class people due to their record profits, out-sourcing, layoffs, pension reneging, and successful lobbying (there are 63 lobbyists per lawmaker)to prevent a raise in the minimun wage.
The rise of the Republican majority has been a huge boon for big business, while the gap between the rich and the poor has been rising at an alarming rate.With wages having been stagnant since the 80's, perhaps it is time to address these inequities.

alc said...

You just demonstrated my point about "the demonization of corporate America". Statistically, more people in the United States are empoyed by small business firms than in the large corporate structures. Most small business companies (corporations) are Mom and Pop organizations, with middle class incomes. It is also rather ironic for someone to be so worried about a percieved, stagnant wage base, and minimum wage, to be so overly enthusiastic to take the people's money in the form of taxes to fund "Big" government.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like the 'demonization'
lies within those who disagree. You should change your blog to "A negative Approach."

alc said...

We can agree to disagree but just because I did not agree with your interpretations of corporate America, doesn't mean I didn't listen you. I prefer to use fact-based information, like the statistics on small business, to make a point. Its a shame you did not give me the same respect to listen...

Anonymous said...

Just the Facts Ma'am

The 2004 U.S. Census Bureau report
The number of people in poverty grew from 32.9 million in 2001 to 37 million last year. The number of working people in poverty grew last year by 563,000.
Overall household incomes failed to rise for the fifth straight year. Income for full time male workers dropped 2.3% last year and for females 1%. Only one segment of the nation’s household’s saw their income’s grow: the top 5%.
The number of people with no health insurance increased to 45.8 million last year. One in 5 workers is uninsured.

Wal-Mart profits were up 11% from 03.

Exon Mobile up 27%

Alcoa up 40%

Phelps (copper mining) up 7 fold

The Fortune 500 index measured a total return up 10.3% in 04.

Of course, the Fortune 500 are the big guys, but if you examine the data, the last two decades have been dismal for middle America (and small business that don’t have the out -sourcing and off-shoring capabilities.) A statistic that is indicative of that growing trend is: Employment in the 04 Fortune 500 rose by 9.6%, while U.S. unemployment rose by less than 1%. That means that as the companies grew, they out-sourced 8.6% of there new jobs. That only reflects the loss in new job growth; millions more have been laid off because of out-sourcing and off-shoring.

I’ve read about and studied these issues for years. I would love to provide you with what ever data you need

alc said...

I've read about and studied these issues for years??? I have lived the life of a corporate director of the owner of a small business for the last 20 or so years. As I stated before, the majority of the population of the US is employed by small business, a current statistic of the National Chamber of Commerce. I do not dispute the data that you put forth but this information reflected the economy during the Clinton administration. You may have pulled the data in 2004 from a website but US census is taken every 10 years and this information came from the 2000 census. You have made my point once again about the demonization of corporate America by liberal Democrats...