This morning, I was in contact with a member of the county legal department to receive clarification on several incorrect items that have been floating around in the public concerning their salaries and benefits. In an article written in the Hernando Today this week, the salaries of the county attorneys, along with their support staff, included benefits. The way the article was written it gave the reader the impression their benefits were in addition to the stated salaries when, in fact, they were already included in the total, per individual.
Mr. Weissinger's salary and benefits have been funded primarily by the Utility Regulation Fund (prior to the purchase of Florida Water) or the Utilities enterprise fund for the past seven years. This funding mechanism for Mr. Weissinger is abundantly clear in the county budget. The Utilities Department budget specifically takes into consideration the need for specialized legal work, such as litigation or human resources matters. These services are handled by the appropriate county attorney who specializes in such law. This budget arrangement for the Utilities Department allows for an "equivalent" of an attorney position, while the work is assigned to the appropriate lawyer to handle any particular matter in the most effective way. This method creates a trade-off of services for the Utilities Department to cover all the requirements of their legal needs.
The lead attorney, Mr. Garth Collar has estimated that the Utilities Department is 50% of Mr. Weissinger's legal work. The remaining 50% of budgeted legal work for the Utilities Department is handled by the appropriate county attorney for specialized work, such as litigation and human resources. The theory behind this accounting method is that only ratepayers (of Utilities) pay for the Utilities Department's legal work, rather than requiring the general public (who are not ratepayers) subsidize this legal work through the general fund.
Cries of fraud were heard from Jaz Zydenbos, candidate for county commission, district 1, on local talk radio this morning as he berated Commissioner Stabins. These unfortunate comments by Mr. Zydenbos could have been prevented had he researched the legal department's funding mechanisms for himself. Mr. Stabins was correct in stating that paying Mr. Weissinger through the Utilities Department was actually saving taxpayers money because Ad Valorem dollars are not used to fund that legal position.
This unique budgetary procedure of the legal department, and the utility department, actually saves a tremendous amount of money by eliminating the need to process each legal procedure through the clerk of court's office which carries stiff administrative fees. This procedure also ensures that Utilities Department receives the appropriate legal services, without taking the tax dollars out of the general fund.